What do you mean put in "epmp like unit"?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote:

>   Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo
> dosnt yield good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need
> special adapters for it to work.
>
>  We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit
>
>
>
>  Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com
> @aeronetpr
>
>
>
>   From: Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>
>   Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP.  I believe the
> force 110 is better gain though.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> no
>>
>>
>>
>> Gino A. Villarini
>> President
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> www.aeronetpr.com
>> @aeronetpr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish???
>> >
>> >Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the
>> >>Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ
>> >>
>> >> Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual
>> >>pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM
>> >>with this contraption????
>> >>
>> >> My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Gino A. Villarini
>> >> President
>> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> >> www.aeronetpr.com
>> >> @aeronetpr
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to