I've definitely heard that and heard some very convincing stories supporting the rumor.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi < sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > Really? First time I'm hearing this and I've been on this list for a > while. I must've missed it. > > > I will tell you now that ePMP was designed and built in Cambium. Hope > that clears up any confusion. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Tyler Treat < > tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:11 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > I think everyone assumed epmp = further refined MemoryLink... At least > initially. > > ___________________________ > Mangled by my iPhone. > ___________________________ > > Tyler Treat > Corn Belt Technologies, Inc. > > tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com > ___________________________ > > > On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi < > sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > > You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > That's a rumor I have heard as well. > > On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie < > j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > > It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased > it off of someone else (possibly Memorylink?) > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either > it's significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or > they purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... > presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead. > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and 450? > That would make way too much sense, though... > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > > Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch) > > > > > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > President > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > www.aeronetpr.com > > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > > *From: *Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM > *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > What do you mean put in "epmp like unit"? > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > > Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo > dosnt yield good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need > special adapters for it to work. > > > > We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit > > > > > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > President > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > www.aeronetpr.com > > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > > *From: *Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM > *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP. I believe the force > 110 is better gain though. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > > no > > > > Gino A. Villarini > President > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > www.aeronetpr.com > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, "John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz> wrote: > > >Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish??? > > > >Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > >> > >> So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the > >>Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ > >> > >> Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual > >>pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM > >>with this contraption???? > >> > >> My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min > >> > >> > >> > >> Gino A. Villarini > >> President > >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > >> www.aeronetpr.com > >> @aeronetpr > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > >