You can do that on a separate DC system. I've seen multiple manufacturers say 
you can't on a PoE system. 

Are your links filling the GigE? 

Most of the time people aren't concerned with protecting the radio, but 
whatever likely more expensive gear is inside or the structure itself. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 8:40:31 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Survay Monkey Should UBNT Make a Radio With AFiber port? 




Many manufacturers recommend surge protectors at both ends. It’s certainly 
possible, I have licensed gigabit POE radios with protectors top and bottom and 
no errors. 

I’ve never seen how a surge protector at the bottom of the tower protects the 
radio at the top, seems like it protects the router/switch/POE. 

Not saying I love my Purewave system, but it has 48VDC on a separate pair of 
wires and they have you put DC protectors top and bottom. They told me field 
failures of basestations went way down with the addition of the DC protectors. 
And capacitance is no issue, you can put big old MOVs, gas tubes, diodes, 
whatever you want on there to absorb the surge. 





From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 7:04 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Survay Monkey Should UBNT Make a Radio With AFiber port? 


Easier to protect power alone than power + data. Usually I see the data going 
out anyway vs. the power side. 

I really did mean ESD as I separated ESD and lightning. 

Usually the manufacturer recommends only one additional surge suppression 
device as to data capacitance issues. That restriction goes away with separate 
power + data (over fiber). 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 10:48:29 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Survay Monkey Should UBNT Make a Radio With AFiber port? 




Why do you say no more ESD issues? (I think you really mean lightning issues, I 
don’t buy this wind blowing across the plastic nonsense.) 

A lot of the time when radios get zapped, it’s the power circuitry that’s 
damaged. You are still powering the radio over copper. Until you figure out how 
to power it with light, you are vulnerable to surges. 

It helps a lot if you put a DC surge protector right at the radio, but how many 
people do? 

And as long as you have a coax jumper to the antenna, you are vulnerable to 
surges finding a path from the antenna to ground via the radio. Again, can be 
mitigated with a good coax surge protector, but how many people do that? 

Inside a POE fed radio, there should be transformers in the data path, it’s the 
power path that has DC continuity. The Ethernet transformers should provide 
quite a bit of resistance to surges due to primary/secondary isolation, 
possibly a ground foil between primary and secondary, plus differential surges 
should be attenuated by transformer core saturation. So the most vulnerable 
circuitry is the power path. Which still exists if you have DC power and data 
over fiber. 





From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 10:35 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Survay Monkey Should UBNT Make a Radio With AFiber port? 


No more ESD issues. No more lightning issues. No more RF issues. 

*EVERYTHING* on a tower should be fiber. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Brett A Mansfield" <br...@silverlakeinternet.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 9:54:16 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Survay Monkey Should UBNT Make a Radio With A Fiber port? 


I personally wouldn't want to have to run fiber and power to the airFiber. One 
cable is already enough. There is really no reason for fiber on any of their 
products. With that said, it's pretty cheap to put the SFP on. There is also no 
reason they cannot put them both on at least the airFiber. 

Thank you, 
Brett A Mansfield 

On Feb 2, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > 
wrote: 




It cannot possibly cost very much - a $35 rb260gs has a sfp port... 

On Monday, February 2, 2015, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>



I don’t think this passes the economic factors model for them.. I don’t think 
they would sell enough of them to make it worth the engineering, mold work, 
etc… 

Peter Kranz 
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd 
www.UnwiredLtd.com 
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 
Mobile: 510-207-0000 
pkr...@unwiredltd.com 

From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of timothy steele 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 4:57 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] Survay Monkey Should UBNT Make a Radio With A Fiber port? 


posting this Survay on All the forums Want to see what you guys think Should 
UBNT Make A Radio with a Fiber Port? I Will Send the Graph to the UBNT Team 



https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/8SPM9NT 



Thanks! 


</blockquote>



Reply via email to