You know that you can add your own hole in the back with a drill bit,
right?  I have done that on those second boxes we were talking about a
couple of times.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
br...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:

> This is what I use, but there is no hole in the back.
>
> http://m.ebay.com/itm/321525398145?nav=SEARCH
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:52 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
>
> UY's work fine. Use them a bunch.
>
> Has ANYONE found a inline waterproof catX coupler for like $5 or less???
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Those won't pass muster with CAT5e or CAT6 specs.  However, the Thomas
>> and Betts 709SC works perfectly.  You untwist less than a keystone jack for
>> sure.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Something like one of these?
>>> <jihhefjj.png>
>>>
>>>
>>> I always thought it would be fast.....but I always assumed it wouldn't
>>> pass muster with CAT5e or CAT6 specs.� If you're untwisting more than
>>> 1/2" to be able to physically fit the splice in, then I think you're adding
>>> more crosstalk than a jack or plug would.�
>>>
>>> *shrug* if it's working, it's working.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Could be male/female, but lately I've been leaning towards butt spliced 
>>> pairs ( times four ).
>>>
>>> I think it's faster for the installes to just cut both cables, do a quick 
>>> separation of pairs and press splice the four pairs together.
>>>
>>> As opposed to punching down a female rj45 and putting a male rj45 end on.
>>>
>>> Maybe not, still debating.
>>>
>>> Not sure what the gigabit Ethernet loss/gain might be between these two 
>>> methods either.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of 
>>> Bill Prince
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 3:11 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Simple Junction Box??
>>>
>>> So what's going to be in the box? RJ45-RJ45 female-female coupler, or what?
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>> On 3/5/2015 10:30 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
>>>
>>>  Mmmm, that second one might work.
>>>
>>> The first one is a bit big for joining cable.
>>>
>>> Still wish the second had an access hole in the back and were even smaller.
>>>
>>> But that's better than any other option I've seen, thanks!
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of 
>>> SmarterBroadband
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 11:17 AM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Simple Junction Box??
>>>
>>> How about this?
>>> https://dthstore.com/webapp/commerce/command/ExecMacro/DescP2GY.mac/Report?O
>>> LD_SHOPPER_REF=&OrderCount=0&OrderTotal=$.00
>>>
>>> $2.99 if you buy 25+
>>>
>>> Or
>>> https://dthstore.com/webapp/commerce/command/ExecMacro/DescB6GY.mac/Report?O
>>> LD_SHOPPER_REF=&OrderCount=0&OrderTotal=$.00
>>>
>>> $1.45 at 25+
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of 
>>> Sterling Jacobson
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 10:08 AM
>>> To: 'af@afmug.com'
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Simple Junction Box??
>>>
>>> Still looking for a simple junction box to cover existing Cat5 coming out 
>>> of the house.
>>> This is for joining the crapping indoor rated existing Cat5 to and outdoor 
>>> rated cable.
>>>
>>> Home Depot has a $3 pvc grey junction box with screw on cover and two � 
>>> inch holes.
>>> That's about the best I can find.
>>>
>>> But I would still have to drill a hole out for the Cat5 coming out of the 
>>> wall.
>>> And completely plug up one hole, and probably caulk up around the outdoor 
>>> rated Cat5/6 coming out the other...
>>>
>>> What I really need is that same junction box with a single smaller hole 
>>> about the side of outdoor Cat6, and a hole in the back.
>>>
>>> Nothing more.
>>>
>>> Can't find anything like that.
>>>
>>> And most stuff like that is over $10, for $1 worth of plastic.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to