Bathtubs?
Chuck McCown wrote:
We fixed lots of roofs, windows, bathtubs, siding etc. But to restore
roof or siding to original condition is a different thing. Very
expensive at times.
*From:* Travis Johnson <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2015 4:23 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna
In this situation (which happened several times, regardless of who
signs what document, etc. etc.) we would go remove our equipment and
fix the damage at our cost. It's not worth all the headaches and
issues in the future.
Travis
On 3/16/2015 1:56 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
Hey all,
So I got an angry call from a owner of a townhouse who rents it out
to one of our new internet customers. We were never made aware the
home was a rental in any way. Our techs always ask permission on
where to mount the dish and bring in the wire and they were given
approval to mount the dish on the roof and drill a hole for the wire.
If it was a rental, we would have talked to the landlord.
The home owner now wants us to remove the dish, cable, and holes and
restore everything to original condition. He wants new siding, new
shingles, the whole works.
I don't exactly know how I should handle this situation. We won't be
pulling the mount off the roof because it is sealed if we leave it
there. We can't move the dish because the signal is only good there.
Do we have any sort of protection from OTARD or anything that allows
us to keep things in place since we were given permission from the
tenant?
Ideas or ways to handle this smoothly? We are not going to pay for
new siding or roofing when we were given permission to install. If
anything, the tenant would be responsible since we did the work on
their behalf.
--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
