Thanks Jeremy! On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Streakwave has them (PBE-5AC-620) in stock now. I am picking some up on > will call. > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Tim Reichhart <t...@nwohiobb.com> wrote: > >> Rory >> >> Ben told me it as been shipping since dec and I have ordered mine and I >> keep getting told I wont have mine until may which is totally uncalled for. >> >> >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway >> *Sent:* Saturday, March 21, 2015 1:37 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >> >> >> >> Is the PBE-5AC-620 shipping yet? >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway >> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 3:43 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >> >> >> >> If I set up a new tower with 802.11ac, am I going to have any problems >> getting CPE’s over the next 3 months? Is there any chance of supply >> shortages? >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Ben Moore >> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 2:59 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >> >> >> >> That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-) You >> can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if they were going >> "on the boat" ;) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >> I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat" out >> of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage. >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last 15 >> years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!! >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable >> value. That has to be a first. >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >> Hey, who says they are accurate?? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >> >> >> >> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual >> hands yet is it? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs >> done in the next couple weeks. >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >> >> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. The >> PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in airprism >> between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp or ptmp, as >> far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation. >> >> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are going >> to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy features >> like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this point is the >> lack of DFS and UNII-1. >> >> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this point >> unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should perform best >> of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this point. I >> expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >> connectorized units? >> >> >> >> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >> >> >> >> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >> >> >> >> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already have >> it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I >> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what >> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >> two things that are going to converge? >> >> >> >> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there >> any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance? >> (future demand is a factor as well) >> >> >> >> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three products >> there? >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
