For the AN50s I always did LMR400 because that's what was there.  It was
never more than 3 meters (9 feet).

For every other radio it's generally what's included.  The biggest I can
think of is the brand we can't say here - might be heavy duty LMR195,
though.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I might do that.
>
> Is that what you use for less than 20ft?
>
> LMR400 has less loss, but I think at that length all the loss is going to
> be the connectors anyway.
>
> 400 is a bit stiff.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 12:58 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Quick antenna question
>
> For <20 feet you could just use 195, I don't think you get any much
> difference at 5 GHz.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  We seal ours as well.
>>
>> I recrimped most of the premade cables I purchased after I got a batch
>> where the ends just came off. Assemble the equipment on the ground for
>> testing, go to line the antenna up for a test shot, notice no signal, the
>> coax is laying on the ground.
>>
>> I didn't take the end off, just hit it again with the crimpers from each
>> direction.
>>
>> That has made me a bit gun shy about LMR400, especially after it happened
>> on a tower.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 12:49 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Quick antenna question
>>
>> Nearly all of my coax is preterminated.  It's all a) Streakwave or b)
>> included with the antenna.  I can't recall if we've ever had a problem with
>> any of it, but we always use coax seal.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  15dBi omni and ~15 to 20ft LMR400.
>>>
>>> Lightning blew the door off the power box on the ground, fried the mini
>>> PCI cards, but the RB600 still worked, just no data across the ethernet
>>> port.
>>>
>>> The unit was hit in 09, was replaced and the antenna and coax have been
>>> in service the whole time. I never replaced it as I thought the hinky rx
>>> signal was just misreported, a 24Mbps link @ -88 shouldn't happen. Rx
>>> signal quality has finally gone down to match the actual numbers now, so I
>>> think something in the antenna was damaged.
>>>
>>> The problem I have here is quality cables. I've gone through around 50
>>> that were replaced by Streakwave. They had a bad batch. Made me quite shy
>>> to replace what appears to be a good cable with one that might just quit
>>> like some others have.
>>>
>>> I made this one in late 08.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 12:12 PM
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Quick antenna question
>>>
>>> more info ...what kind of antenna?  how much RF cable and what kind is
>>> it?  what do connectors look like ?
>>>
>>>  Jaime Solorza
>>> Wireless Systems Architect
>>> 915-861-1390
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I had a tower hit by lightning. The antenna appeared to survive, so I
>>>> replaced electronics and let it go.
>>>>
>>>> The system reports low rx signal, 20dB worse than expected, but got the
>>>> speeds I expected, so originally I thought the signal was just being
>>>> misreported by the new equipment. It has degraded now, so we're working on
>>>> it this afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> I'm replacing the antenna, but what are the odds that the coax is
>>>> damaged as well?
>>>>
>>>> I've got spare, probably going to send it up with the climber anyway.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to