figured wth, this 5.6.1 beta 3 is out so i put that on some test units, nice to see a real time tool available again, that never hurts
We dont do much with our UBNT its pretty much all wds bridge, so are there any major bugs? I see something about titanium rockets croaking on gigabit ethernet, is that across the board for them? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:14 PM, timothy steele <timothy.pct...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a list of working OIDs for 5.5.10 on the power code forum I don't > have a link sorry > > — > Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > >> No Airmax. No ETH status. I'm sure there is more. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Apr 7, 2015 6:01 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The existing SNMP stack on 5.5.10 works as long as you *DON'T TOUCH* >>> the OIDs that don't work. Touch any of the non-functional OIDs and the SNMP >>> query will come back null. The OIDs that do work (and I haven't explored >>> extensively) are: >>> >>> traffic >>> uptime >>> signal level >>> data rate >>> load average >>> noise floor (but it's a lie) >>> >>> We also have 5.6 running on exactly one subscriber radio. It provides >>> many more OIDs that all seem to work. It's been running fine for about 2 >>> months with no apparent problems. Note that all the OIDs are different >>> between 5.5.10 and 5.6. >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 4/7/2015 2:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> most of our ubnt crap sits on 5.5.10, of course the powercode real time >>> monitors dont work, halk the existing graphs arent working >>> trying to figure out from the ubnt forums where snmp stands is like >>> screwing a piranha. >>> >>> pretty much everything thats not airfiber we have is M series. Is there >>> a list of functional OIDs for 5.5.10? >>> >>> isnt 5.6 beta supposed to have some mibs? is there a stable enough beta? >>> >>> what year is this? >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
