I believe that is the entire intention of skins.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can I use skins to give customers access in a limited capacity, create a > user account called customer or whatever and a customer group that has > limited access like no winbox, etc. Let them manage their wireless, > internal subnets, port forwards, whatever? What I saw glancing at the > metarouter thing seems like its a bigger deal than I wanted to get into, > but if I could create a generic skin for the customer login to load in each > one, that would be slick > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> > wrote: > >> How would you rate the boxes handling traffic and uptime in general? >> Just curious… >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul McCall >> *Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 3:32 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Pros/Cons and recomendations >> >> >> >> Steve…. Do you trust me? Mikrotik all the way, just DO IT! … >> routerboard.com has all the models. >> >> >> >> slicker than owl-snot on linoleum floor J One of the best things we >> ever did for our network >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *That One Guy >> *Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 3:27 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik Pros/Cons and recomendations >> >> >> >> After poking around at many different brands, it seems Mikrotik is the >> right fit for our network and budget. >> >> >> >> I dont fully understand the licensing tiers >> >> >> >> Is there a sizing chart on these? >> >> >> >> Is the interface similar between the router models and the switch models? >> Are the mikrotik switches comparable to the HP procurve in reliability? >> >> >> >> It would be the bees knees to see out network more universal as far as >> management interfaces go, we have three purposes for routers: >> >> >> >> our upstream routers, which we have 2, will ultimately be running OSPF >> internally and BGP externally (current thought) 200mbps-1gbps projected >> need through the next couple of years. >> >> >> >> Our network/POP routers ranging from 1 customer at a POP to 150 >> >> >> >> A residential solution comparable to the UBNT AirRouters (1-25mbps rate >> plans) wifi capable. >> >> >> >> If the switches have similar interfaces, we would look toward replacing a >> combination of UBNT toughswitch POE, and a variety of HP procurves from >> 1810G to 2510G and their other POE models. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I note alot of discussion regarding MT ethernet negotiation flakiness, >> how much of an impact does this present? Right now we have imagestream and >> fortigate on the network, and have zero issues with that. >> >> >> >> >> >> The decision to go toward mikrotik is primarily based on cost and >> community support availability within the industry. (this consideration has >> alot to do with a single point of administrative failure in only having one >> person, me, training to design, maintain, support, and grow the network, in >> the event i became absent from the picture) The winbox interface and >> feature availability within was also a primary consideration for support >> staff. >> >> >> >> I would like to her from people entrenched in MT who love/hate it, >> anybody who turned their back on it, and anybody who moved toward it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
