I'd guess that it might be one they just forgot to submit the license for after a PCN.
I'd just give them a holler and let them know that you couldn't find it in the FCC license database and was wondering if it had been coordinated recently. -forrest On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> wrote: > Hey guys, > > We've been looking at a new site for the last 12 months now and finally > got to climb it last week to do the survey. 9 months ago from the ground, > we could see two SAF licensed links up there but upon searching the FCC > database, could not identify any licensed links on this site. I figured > maybe they were in process and don't show up right away. Anyway, fast > forward to today and we climbed and saw the links are 18GHz links and have > the company's sticker on there we thought they belonged to. We checked the > FCC database and found all their other licensed links and confirmed they're > accurate and used their exact spelling and FRN to search all the licensed > links and none of them correspond to their two SAF radio on this site that > have been installed and running for 9 months now. So to sum up, their other > licensed links are registered and correct but the two links on this site do > not show up anywhere. > > What would be the best course of action to see if there's something wrong > here? This WISP has not been friendly to us in the past and I just want to > make sure their links don't interfere with ours if they're illegally > operating in licensed bands. Thank you > > -- > Darin Steffl > Minnesota WiFi > www.mnwifi.com > 507-634-WiFi > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
