I should clarify. The AC latency is solid at 1-3ms. It only hit 6ms under heavy load. We have another link in place, 30Mhz channel, very noisy (CINR19), dish too small on one side -67, I pull 90Mbps all day through this link and it has been up for months now without a single issue. This one feeds my house. It blows away the Rocket M5 that we had up on the same 30MHz channel.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rocket M5 craps out around 60Mbps. You can increase the channel size to > 30 or 40 and maybe occasionally see 80Mbps on a Rocket M5. On the Rocket > we would see latency go through the roof under full load. It would hit > near 300-400ms at times. On the AC PTP we immediately saw 140Mbps on a > fairly dirty 30MHz channel (21CINR), and latency hovered around 6ms even > under full load. I haven't played with the AC enough to really push it to > the limit and see what it can do, but it smokes the M series stuff like > night and day. > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote: > >> Can you share some numbers compared to Rocket M5? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 1, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I have been running beta2 on PTP UBNT AC for months now without issue, >> and am extremely happy with the product (except the whole DFS >> issue...surprise!). If beta2 has issues I haven't seen them. Is it worth >> upgrading to beta5? I'm of the mindset 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'. >> I am especially leery of upgrading firmware that is working fine. I'll >> watch the forums for awhile and then upgrade, like usual. Meanwhile, this >> AC PTP is rocking! >> >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Matt Hardy <m...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> There were some issues with AC PTP fixed with the latest beta (released >>> this week), but to my knowledge there are no known issues with PtMP. >>> Everyone that is using AC PtMP seems to be happy... >>> >>> -Matt >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) < >>> r...@latrobeit.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That’s the opposite to what I see. >>>> >>>> The old Rocket’s for me were better with interference. >>>> >>>> That being said, I’ve only tried P2P with AC kit >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 30 April 2015 3:34 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I’m seeing good results with RM5AC in regards to interference and weak >>>> signals.. Probably 4x better than RM5 radios. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) >>>> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:37 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Depending on what vendor is doing the testing the results are different. >>>> >>>> Really hard to decide if I’m upgrading or side grading. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Not so keen on the AC stuff, seems not to like interference and need >>>> super strong signal. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rhys >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Josh Reynolds [mailto:j...@spitwspots.com <j...@spitwspots.com>] >>>> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 30 April 2015 1:34 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com; Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Its the same chip :P >>>> >>>> That aside, have not, so I'll back out of this now. >>>> >>>> On April 29, 2015 7:31:54 PM AKDT, "Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T)" < >>>> r...@latrobeit.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP? >>>> >>>> I can’t decide if I should take the plunge. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have about 2000 customers, any Rocket with about 50+ customers is >>>> staring to bend. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Any thought please? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
