I tried it on an AF5 link... just because... I couldn't make it work. you need to have some separation between the two channels.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Chuck Macenski <ch...@macenski.com> wrote: > While I have seen that work with AF24, I am not sure I have seen it work > with AF5/5U. Certainly not a recommended mode of operation.... > > Chuck > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> Maybe the question was can TX and RX be set to the same frequency on >> the AF5 in FDD mode, given that it is using separate antennas rather than a >> diplexer. >> >> *From:* Chuck Macenski <ch...@macenski.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 05, 2015 9:49 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >> >> The Rx and Tx Channel ranges are the same.... >> >> Chuck >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >> wrote: >> >>> In Ubiquiti's version of FDD, is it different channel range for the >>> Rx? The risk there is anyone else sees that channel as clear. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On May 4, 2015, at 11:03 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've been seeing 1-2ms on out AF5x link, not quite as good as an AF5 >>> in FDD, but better than any other synced radio I've seen. >>> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < >>> geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I have one AF5 up running FDD in the DFS band at 3.4 miles. We didn't >>>> want to try to push an AF24 that far. RTT average is around 0.8ms, so yes, >>>> like a licensed radio. >>>> >>>> No idea about the AF5X, haven't bought any. But I'd guess latency would >>>> be similar to the AF5 or 24 in half-duplex mode, which is going to be like >>>> 4-5ms. I have only done FDD though.. because it's moar better. >>>> >>>> On 5/4/2015 5:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>> >>>>> So I assume latency in FDD mode is sub millisecond like a licensed >>>>> backhaul? >>>>> >>>>> What's is latency like on the AF5X? Similar to a PTP600, a few >>>>> milliseconds and very constant? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) >>>>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:48 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >>>>> >>>>> No FDD. Not 48 volt. Not 40+ watts. >>>>> >>>>> On 5/4/2015 5:45 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Can someone point me to a concise explanation somewhere of the >>>>>> difference between AF5 and AF5X? Where you would use each, and what you >>>>>> give up with the X in return for smaller, cheaper, lower power, and >>>>>> drop-in >>>>>> replacement for a Rocket? >>>>>> >>>>>> I know it doesn't have the built-in high isolation TX and RX >>>>>> antennas, and doesn't do a gig of throughput. But I'm sure there's more >>>>>> to >>>>>> it. It's not jumping out at me on the UBNT website. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
