Yes both sides have a puck. It's the AP hardware. With 2.4.2 it can have 10 subs.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 9, 2015 4:50 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > Ok one last question. Does Force110 PTP have GPS built into it? One end or > both ends? I should probably get a kit... > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 9, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > No > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote: > >> Does non-GPS ePMP receive sync over power? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 9, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Kidding right? I think all of our APs are sync over power excepting >> PTP450, which only does timing port sync. We've just found sync over power >> to be most reliable. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 5/9/2015 10:43 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: >> >> Why even mess with Poe sync?� >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> @gvillarini >> >> >> >> On May 9, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Darren Shea <darr...@ecpi.com> wrote: >> >> Forrest, >> >> ��� Cambium has admitted there is a problem with GPS sync over >> power dropping for no reason on the ePMP APs with some software versions, >> and it is a cross-platform problem. It doesn�t seem to be any worse on >> our PacketFlux gear than it is on the LMG CTM-2M � and we only see this >> on ePMP, never with PMP 100, 320, 430, or 450. Luckily, we did deploy the >> puck antennas on all of those AP�s, and they seem to work just fine with >> the built-in sync. Cambium is expecting to fix it in a future software >> release. >> >> � >> >> � >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Forrest Christian (List Account) >> *Sent:* Friday, May 08, 2015 4:49 PM >> *To:* af >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 and ePMP with Packet Flux Gear >> >> � >> >> I'll let others speak to the stability (as a couple already have). >> >> A few months ago there was an issue with a mutual customer of mine and >> cambium's which was having sync problems with an epmp radio.�� To date, >> I don't know if the problem was with the epmp, or with the injector, or >> with a gps lock, or whatever.������ I can't say that sync is a >> perfect thing - from time to time, gps modules act weird, injectors don't >> inject, and AP's don't work right - no matter which product you have.� >> When sync does bad things, it behaves badly.� For all I know, in this >> case my product *might* have been at fault.� Or not.� It's not >> important for the rest of the story.... >> >> In any case, somehow this problem morphed into a statement that somehow >> the SyncInjectors had some sort of systemic issue which lots of wisps were >> experiencing.�� I was not particularly amused by this, particularly >> since I had no communication from cambium at all in relation to this.... >> After some back and forth with my internal contact at cambium I was >> informed that a) that they were tracking some *potential* issue with >> external sync (usually with a syncinjector) on the ePMP and b) that they >> hadn't had the time to figure out if it was packetflux-specific or a >> general issue yet, and that if they determined it was related to my product >> they'd contact me back.� So far, no call back, and I haven't heard any >> more similar complaints - and I've had interactions with a lot of people >> who use this regularly with ePMP with no known issues.� I also haven't >> seen anything sync-related in the release notes since that time. >> >> -forrest >> >> � >> >> � >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications >> Inc <t...@franklinisp.net> wrote: >> >> General question here.� I saw something in the Cambium forum >> questioning the reliability of Packet flux Sync Injectors. >> >> � >> >> If you use them, are your GPS syncs stable and is power output reliable >> on the 450 and ePMP gear? >> >> >> >