Do these things have a limit to the number of secondary IPs you can put on an interface? I cant find it documentedOn Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:No problems with newer 6.x Version. We’ve 6.15 and 6.25 running on them. Seems 6.x tree matures. But it is MT. You never know ;-)). *Von:*Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy /sarcasm *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015 16:51 *An:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Betreff:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version just got in an rb1100ahx2 What is the current most stable software version recomended on these?--If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. --If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
I have not encountered a limit. In a few places I had an embarrassing
number of IP's on one interfaces.
- [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version That One Guy /sarcasm
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Stefan Englhardt
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version That One Guy /sarcasm
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Adam Moffett
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Dennis Burgess
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version That One Guy /sarcasm
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Mike Hammett
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version That One Guy /sarcasm
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Shayne Lebrun
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Paul Stewart
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS vers... Shayne Lebrun
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS vers... Adam Moffett
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS vers... Paul Stewart
- Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version Adam Moffett
