Well, if you are worried about your own router going out, then you could set up 
VRRP between the two routers and one will fail over for the other.

You could apply for ARIN ID number and have your providers SWIP the blocks to 
you if they are /24 or larger.

Not sure they would be willing to hand off to each other, but you could BGP if 
they would.

If one of the providers goes out then you could get tricky and masquerade that 
public block through the other provider.
It's not pretty and it will still incoming unsolicited requests to that public 
IP, but to the customers regular internet it will appear about the same and 
still work.



-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] miktroik question

Sterling
I got 2 different IP blocks from 2 different providers and I dont have my own 
IP space yet but looking to do something soon.

I dont have have BGP setup or anything like that. I just have stock MK setup 
right now.

Tim

-----Original Message----- 
> From: "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net> 
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Date: 06/23/15 09:19 PM 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] miktroik question 
> 
> Are you just masquerading?
> 
> If so, then something like that should work well enough.
> 
> If you are routing public space behind your router, then it won't work.
> 
> You would need BGP or temporary masquerading of the public block on the 
> non-native route or something like that.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:10 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] miktroik question
> 
> Hey all
> I have an miktroik question to ask you all to see if this would be able to 
> work on MK lets say I have 2 different ISP's going into MK and I want to have 
> an failover connection encase one fiber connection go downs and I have an 
> back up would this work: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=49468 or 
> not?
> 
> Tim




Reply via email to