Yeah, but the great thing about NAT is that my network isn't public.
That is my primary argument with IPv6.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] private ipv4 sale / leases
You could use a single IPv6 to say, Mars.
And everyone on Mars could have their own static IP that uses the first 64
to get to Mars and the second 64 to get to all the subscribers. Assuming
routers exist that would do this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 7:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] private ipv4 sale / leases
Just saying that NAT is not needed. Every single IP gives you so much
address space that you will never be able to use it.
Essentially a number of globally routable set of static IPs come with
every IP such that one single IP could probably run the whole planet
right now.
You mean every /64 which is minimum customer assignment in most
respects does. A single IPv6 IP is still just a single IP.
