We’re employing what we’re calling Dynamic Interference Filtering in this platform… this is actually circuitry that “wraps around” the selected operating channel, effectively isolation noise from all other frequencies. Once you change channels, this filter moves with it. Because this is an ultrawide band (supporting 4900-5925 MHz), we think this filtering will really help mitigate “off channel” but “in band” noise.
Because this product utilized a newer generation FPGA (actually a SoC), we have much more processing power available. At release, we’re over three times more PPS than the PMP 450, and there’s room to grow. Headline throughput is the same as PMP 450 today, but you will see differences (improvements) with smaller packet traffic, when NAT is on, etc. We will also have improvements to headline throughput coming in future releases. Matt From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 1:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i Would like to see more information about the 450i interference mitigation advances over the 450.. and PPS/Throughput improvements over the 450. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com<http://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 pkr...@unwiredltd.com<mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com>
