60000’ is 11.36 miles, yet the laser goes 10 miles?   Guess it only works if 
the receiver is on a mountain.

Mark

> On Aug 2, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It says these things would be at 60,000 feet, so pretty much all of that 
> would be well below. It says they can do 10Gbps and they'll work up to 10 
> miles, but it doesn't say they can do 10 gig at 10 miles...
> 
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Laser need LOS in the real sense. Fog, rain, smoke, birds, planes, ...
> Or you give them enough power to remove the problem ;-).
> 
> 
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Jeremy <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> Datum: 02.08.2015 17:01 (GMT+01:00) 
> An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Facebook testing drones with lasers for Internet 
> 
> Ah, I guess my subconscious desire added that.  I have always thought that 
> lasers backed by RF would be the future of wireless.  They'll have to have RF 
> also for when a bird flies through it.
> 
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I don’t see the “on the ground” part:
>  
> We've also made a breakthrough in laser communications technology. We've 
> successfully tested a new laser that can transmit data at 10 gigabits per 
> second. That's ten times faster than any previous system, and it can 
> accurately connect with a point the size of a dime from more than 10 miles 
> away.
>  
>  
> From: Jeremy <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 9:53 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Facebook testing drones with lasers for Internet
>  
> It talks about the lasers being able to align to a spot on the ground "the 
> size of a dime".  That seems like drone to ground lasers to me.
>  
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Laser between moving objects sound quite unbelievable.
> 
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> Datum: 02.08.2015 16:10 (GMT+01:00) 
> An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Facebook testing drones with lasers for Internet 
> 
> Lasers between drones, RF to ground.
>  
> Still probably more challenging in the real world than Facebook is 
> anticipating.  But they also are probably not designing for people who will 
> complain to the FCC about not getting 99.999% reliability.
>  
>  
> From: Rory Conaway <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 10:50 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [AFMUG] Facebook testing drones with lasers for Internet
>  
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/07/facebook-our-drones-will-use-lasers-to-deliver-10gbps-internet-access/
>  
> <http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/07/facebook-our-drones-will-use-lasers-to-deliver-10gbps-internet-access/>
>  
> 
> The interesting part is the laser working at 10Gbps at 10 miles.
> 
>  
> 
> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO
> 
> 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
> 
> 602-426-0542 <tel:602-426-0542>
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>
>  
> 
> “Things could be worse. Suppose your errors were counted and published every 
> day, like those of a baseball player. ~Author Unknown”
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 

Reply via email to