There's no doubt about it, it's clear fact. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sep 10, 2015 3:49 PM, "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we can believe Cambium, they have quite a bit more secret sauce than > just the GUI. > > On 9/10/2015 3:18 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote: > > I am not sure why the signals would read differently, but i'm curious how > you arrived at the 60 to 70% throughput increase. > Other than the ability to sync, I thought the main difference between > UBNT's M series and ePMP was the user interface?? > > On 9/10/2015 2:06 PM, Christopher Gray wrote: > > I just changed two low bandwidth 5 MHz width PTP links from Rocket M2 > radios to ePMP 2.4 GHz non-sync radios. The "signal strength" is about 10 > dB lower with the ePMP radios. Do they use a different mechanism to > calculate signal strength? > > Link 1: > > - 2x Rocket Dish RD-2G24 > - Antennas were not re-aimed when switching radios > - Radio outputs are maximized on both systems to FCC PTP limits > - UBNT signal read -62 dBm Tx / -61 dBm Rx > - ePMP singal reads -72 dBm Tx / -70 dBm Rx > > Link 2: > > - 1x Rocket Dish RD-2G24 > - 1x L-Com DPD 18 dBi Dish > - Antennas were not re-aimed when switching radios > - Radio outputs are maximized on both systems to FCC PTP limits > - UBNT signal read -70 dBm Tx / -72 dBm Rx > - ePMP singal reads -80 dBm Tx / -82 dBm Rx > > Both links were stable, and both links appear stable now. Both ePMP links > have 60-70% more throughput. Do I just need to adjust my mental meter 10 > db? Are the new signals actually as concerning as they feel? > > Thanks - Chris > > > >
