Lots of licenses were guessed at from topo map coordinates. I know, I was
the guesser for many years.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:18 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fulton County, GA discovers new and amazing 3000+km MW
path
I have recently been using aerial photography to correlate ULS-listed
lat/long
of some part 101 things where they really are.
I have found a lot of glaring errors where the z/y coodinates are off by 50
meters or more, on new links. Nowadays this is in my opinion inexcusable, a
$300
smartphone on a rooftop or hilltop will see ten GPS satellites and four or
five
GLONASS satellites. Everything I've put up recently is accurate in x/y/z
dimensions to 2 meters or less, including the AGL figure.
On September 24, 2015 at 5:50 AM "Hardy, Tim" <tha...@comsearch.com>
wrote:
Typical example of the many errors one can find in ULS and why it’s a bad
idea
to use this data for interference analysis / coordination. To make this
particular example even worse, the receive call sign is supposed to be
WNTN687
– but the transmit license in the example (WNEQ438) is still listed as
current
and active in ULS but we know that the station was moved in 2005 and this
license is no longer valid.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 1:16 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Fulton County, GA discovers new and amazing 3000+km MW
path
From the FCC ULS...
Nice path, I guess?
Attached image.
