Isn’t this XPIC minus the cross-polarization? I wonder if this is strictly signal processing, in which case the difficulty would be not overloading the receiver front end (especially in a small inexpensive piece of gear like a handset)? Or do they employ some kind of diplexer/circulator/isolator type of passive technology to knock out most of the xmt signal before it gets to the rcv active circuitry? Again, more practical in a basestation than a handset.
From: Brian Webster Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:14 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Kumu Networks demonstrates same channel full-duplex I would think this technology will also have uses in the cable industry for their DOCSIS systems. Full duplex of any frequency has major implications. I was hoping this wasn’t just going to be theory and actually make it in to the market. Think about all the backhaul capacity this could bring. Thank You, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:21 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Kumu Networks demonstrates same channel full-duplex http://www.technologyreview.com/news/541856/trick-that-doubles-wireless-data-capacity-stands-up-in-cell-network-tests/ Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net www.triadwireless.net “Things could be worse. Suppose your errors were counted and published every day, like those of a baseball player.” ~Author Unknown
