Hello all,  The Stratalink24 is FCC certified for 3 ft antennas, with TX
power set to -3 dBm.

John Seaman | Sales | *Trango Systems, Inc. | *
*+1-858-248-4006 <+1-858-248-4006> *
 |
www.trangosys.com <http://trangosys.com/>
*[image: Trango Systems] <http://www.trangosys.com/> *
Upcoming Events:  Gitex Dubai Oct 18 - 22
*Innovating Microwave Backhaul**™*
[image: LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/96727?trk=tyah> [image:
Twitter] <http://twitter.com/#!/@trangosystems> [image: Facebook]
<http://www.facebook.com/TrangoSystems> [image: Google]
<http://g.co/maps/c42pd> [image: YouTube]
<http://www.youtube.com/trangosystems> [image: Email]
<http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/d.jsp?llr=ddsu9ilab&p=oi&m=1111619160163>

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure you can… just turn down the TX power.
>
>
>
> SAF has their Integra 24GHz FCC certified with 4ft antennas even.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Daniel White
>
> afmu...@gmail.com
>
> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
>
> Skype: danieldwhite
> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>: Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:00 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Trango stratalink 24 sale
>
>
>
> I don't think you can use a 3' antenna with the stratalink24 in FCC land
> due to total eirp limits... Just Canada or other places.
>
> On Oct 15, 2015 2:12 PM, "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sync is a good feature, but personally, given the low EIRP limit at 24ghz
> I think the option for higher antenna gain is a bigger deal.  I also
> suspect that high perf dishes would allow for channel re-use without sync.
>
> I really can't do 24ghz more than 3 miles in any case, so it's pretty rare
> that we're using any of these things to start with.  So I don't have as
> much experience with that as some of you do, and maybe my opinion is not
> well informed.
>
> On 10/15/2015 4:34 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>
> Exalt is also doing their ExtendAir G2 in 24GHz U/L now. Which is probably
> about the same pricing as the Stratalink, although ~half the speed being
> that it's only 256QAM. Neither of these seem reasonable to me when the AF24
> exists. Yeah, the AF24 uses the whole 200MHz, but at least you can sync
> them.
>
> On 10/15/2015 1:44 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> Yes. Midwest maximum rain rates are way up there.
>
> Looking back in our records, our AF24 (not HD) have lost ~~ 3 dBm during
> our last real rain event last December. These are 2.25 mile links.
>
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 11:38 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> The funny thing about the pacific northwest is that it's only ITU rain
> zone D. We get constant rain and drizzle and grey skies that causes
> acceptable fades (like, an 18 GHz link that normally sites at -37 with no
> rain will hang out at -49 for days at a time), but major downpour events
> are relatively rare. It's the mm/hour...
>
> If I recall correctly some locations that are less famously rainy such as
> Baltimore or Chicago actually have more frequent high mm/hour rain events
> than Seattle. Thus a link designed to be at max capacity for five nines
> will be shorter in Chicago than in Portland or Seattle.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed for the NW where you are. We're in the SF bay area, and we get
> "rain", but not like you guys. For the last 4 years we haven't even gotten
> that.
>
> I know of a couple situations that are getting almost 10 miles on a AF24HD.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 10/15/2015 11:31 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> 5.5 miles is probably asking too much, I would use it at a max of 5-6 km
> in a Pacific Northwest rain zone.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>

Reply via email to