Lewis, when was the last time you looked one?

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It keeps coming up because they all suck.
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, 10:48 PM Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If anyone's interested, I'd be happy to set them up with a fully
>> operational Platypus system.  So versatile and easy to use.  PM mw.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
>> li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect it's because there is yet to be a good solution. Their either
>>> way over priced like visp and powercode, or you need to be or hire an
>>> expert with Linux and/or security for billmax and platypus.
>>>
>>> I'd like to find something low cost and turnkey that is simple and easy
>>> to use for both my techs and customers...and that works and is out of beta.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>
>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 6:18 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> every 2 weeks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Didn't we just have this thread?
>>>>
>>>> Powercode
>>>> Wispmon
>>>> Visp
>>>> Billmax
>>>>
>>>> Man I'm drawing a blank sorry guys
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>> On Nov 5, 2015 7:24 PM, "Matt" <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is everyone using for billing and ticketing?  We are using in
>>>>> house built database/ticketing and standard accounting package for
>>>>> billing.  Works ok but would like something that saves time by
>>>>> bringing everything together.  What are typical per user costs for a
>>>>> system?
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Philip J. Rankin
>> Wireless Telecommunications Services
>> PO Box 24
>> Pittsburg, KS  66762
>>
>

Reply via email to