Very popular for custom prem demarc equipment though.  When I had a DS3 from 
Verizon, they put a bunch of Adtran equipment on the wall to terminate the OC3 
and hand off 3 x DS3 with test jacks and battery backup.  Their IADs are very 
popular with CLECs.

Back when I sold T1 service, their TSU line was the standard for T1 DSUs, I 
still have several in my pile of stuff I hate to send to the recycler.  Even 
when I used Cisco WIC cards, I always carried an Adtran TSU for troubleshooting 
from the front panel and as a golden standard.

When I was active in ANSI standards committees, Adtran was very active in the 
HDSL arena, and they have traditionally had a lot of HSDL and SHDSL products.  
Those rural ILECs that have SHDSL fed remote DLSAMs are likely using Adtran 
equipment.

I am not familiar with their fiber optic products.


From: ch...@wbmfg.com 
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

But in the ILEC world, Adtran has always been the ersatz carrier class vendor.  
Never quite up to snuff.  

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 1:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

Adtran is a long time telecom industry supplier so they are used to supporting 
important customers, and given their location they can literally hire rocket 
scientists.

From: Chuck McCown 
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:59 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

Adtran channel banks are just fine.  But their FTTH stuff leaves plenty to be 
desired.  TA5000 is  an E7 wanna be.  

From: Paul Stewart 
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 11:04 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

Exactly …. Adtran’s marketing on some of their products and what their “real 
world experience” is doesn’t like up.  Having said that, the TA5000 system has 
promise and I’ve seen a number of ILEC’s deploying it (and CLEC’s).  Calix’s 
big issue is they have their head up their $$s on a lot of stuff – once you 
waive 6 figures in front of them they seem to wake up …. Adtran on the other 
hand will spend as much time as needed even over a $1k deal 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:40 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

 

Just wish their products were as good as Calex et al.  

 

From: Lewis Bergman 

Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 10:35 AM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

 

I think Adtran is likely the best company in tech when comparing product and 
support. I wish I could claim I had as good a support team as they have. 
Amazing.

 

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, 11:22 AM Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote:

  On 11/25/15 7:27 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
  > I assume if they are using IP in the backbone, they aren’t doing it the
  > same way we do VoIP on the last mile, which is very inefficient, and
  > introduces a lot of latency.


  I supervised a CLEC delivery of SIP trunks yesterday - over a T1 (as
  EFM) using an Adtran 814.

  ~Seth

Reply via email to