Any chance a PTP450i or PTP450 could talk to a PTP430? Would make some pending upgrades SO much easier.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Aaron Schneider < aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > Yes, just be aware that for 430 to talk to 450i AP in its native mode, the > 430's will need to be the latest 13.4.1 Open Beta. Otherwise, you'll have > to enable the "legacy mode" on the 450i AP to let the older SW register. > Enabling this mode limits the radio HW Queue depths to be compatible with > the older SW. > > > > The SMs need to be upgraded to be able to detect these new depths and > adapt automatically during registration. For 430, 13.4.1 was the first > load which supports this, and for 450, 13.3 was the first load which > supports this (it originally came with 5ms Frame support, which was/is a > 450/450i only feature). > > > > You can find this option on the 450i AP's Radio Configuration page: > > > > > > This is only there for you to use for migration of SW releases – it is not > meant to be on indefinitely once all of your SMs are on acceptable releases > (which is now 14.1.1 for 450i/450 sectors, including 450/430 SMs), as > having it on will impact the performance capability of the 450i AP. > > > > Regards, > > -Aaron > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 1:06 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP > > > > Yes you can, Mark. > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh < > m...@amplex.net> > > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM > > To: af@afmug.com > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP > > > > We have a number of towers to convert from 4 450’s with 90 degree sectors > to 6 AP’s with 60 degree sectors. Most of these are already at 80-90% 450 > SM’s. I was asking if I can go directly to 450i AP’s without having to > finish collecting the 430’s. > > > > Mark > > > > > On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi < > sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark’s question on 430 “upgrade” > project where I assumed he was eventually going to upgrade his 430 SMs to > 450/450i. Perhaps it was an incorrect assumption. Believe it or not, my > responses aren’t loaded when I post here. > > > > > > > > >> On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> "right away" sounds ominous > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- From: Sriram Chaturvedi > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM > > >> To: af@afmug.com > > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP > > >> > > >> 450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out > right away. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Sriram > > >> > > >> ________________________________________ > > >> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh < > m...@amplex.net> > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM > > >> To: af@afmug.com > > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP > > >> > > >> How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i > instead of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 > SM�s swapped first? > > >> > > >> Mark > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider < > aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried > this with PTP mode. I�ll let you know. > > >>> > > >>> 450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 > was. 430 - 450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO > with the way we did MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data). > 450i - 450 is much more similar, and we have been using that combination > internally for a long time. It wasn�t part of the initial release of > 450i due to needing to focus on the HW release itself. > > >>> > > >>> I�ll be in touch on the PTP question. It is important to allow you > to upgrade a PTP link one end at a time. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> -Aaron > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" > >>> <af-boun...@afmug.com > on behalf of geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I thought interop was only for PMP? > > >>>> > > >>>> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote: > > >>>>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now? > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
