Isn't throughput supposed to be slightly worse with 2.5ms, or am I remembering that wrong? There is definitely a big improvement in latency.
Either way, I don't think the difference in throughput is enough to care about, I'd rather have the lower latency. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > A bit more throughput. Not worth changing from 5ms to 2.5ms if all you're > after is throughput. Any new APs I do 2.5ms instead of 5ms since there's > no reason to do it "the old way". You do get better latency - 7.5ms > improvement. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's a big day for ePMP threads. >> >> If I recall correctly, the 2.5ms frame size was introduced to aid in >> collocation with the PMP100. Is there any performance impact? My first >> thought was that a shorter frame would give me lower latency, but it's >> probably not that simple. >> >> >> >
