Isn't throughput supposed to be slightly worse with 2.5ms, or am I
remembering that wrong? There is definitely a big improvement in latency.

Either way, I don't think the difference in throughput is enough to care
about, I'd rather have the lower latency.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> A bit more throughput.  Not worth changing from 5ms to 2.5ms if all you're
> after is throughput.  Any new APs I do 2.5ms instead of 5ms since there's
> no reason to do it "the old way".  You do get better latency - 7.5ms
> improvement.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's a big day for ePMP threads.
>>
>> If I recall correctly, the 2.5ms frame size was introduced to aid in
>> collocation with the PMP100.  Is there any performance impact?  My first
>> thought was that a shorter frame would give me lower latency, but it's
>> probably not that simple.
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to