We bought through Powercode.

Regards,
Chuck

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Tushar Patel <tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:

> We don't use Powercod so I wanted to find somebody who is not biased
> toward powercode for integration.
>
> Tushar
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
> Powercode.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Tushar Patel <tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:
>
>> We are considering procera, any reseller suggestion?
>>
>> Tushar
>>
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have gigs more capacity than we use.  The Procera is much more than
>> that.
>>
>> So many tools...We use it as a tool to identify usage, so that users can
>> be told how their connection is being used when they say they are not using
>> it....bandwidth shaping for 900MHz AP's...network diagnostics for
>> VoIP...and many more.  Support loves it, begs for it, and uses it on most
>> bandwidth complaint calls.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote:
>>
>>> This is why I try to solve bandwidth problems with throwing more
>>> bandwidth in.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Chuck Hogg
>>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 17:49
>>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Used procera
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Example, our Procera licensing lapsed, I just paid the full price to get
>>> us current, even though we will only be getting <6mths of support.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Same with Barracuda basically.
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Simon Westlake
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 7:51 AM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Used procera
>>>
>>> I would not buy a 7720. If it's not listed on Procera's website under
>>> 'Products', it's EOL and they may not even license it anymore. Without
>>> licensing, it's essentially worthless.
>>>
>>> What I would do is contact a Procera reseller first, let them know what
>>> you're looking at, and they can generate a quote for you to license/support
>>> it. It may be cheaper than buying a new one if it's an expensive chassis,
>>> but I doubt you would save much in this particular case, and you may end up
>>> with an unusable chassis.
>>>
>>> On 12/5/2015 9:48 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>>> >
>>> > What are the cons of buying a used procera?
>>> >
>>> > http://m.ebay.com/itm/PacketLogic-Procera-PL7720-IPE-DPI-Appliance-Pac
>>> > ket-Shaper-Deep-packet-inspect-/301749867874?nav=SEARCH
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon Westlake
>>> Skype: Simon_Sonar
>>> Email: simon@sonar.software
>>> Phone: (702) 447-1247
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Sonar Software Inc
>>> The next generation of ISP billing and OSS https://sonar.software
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to