Yeah, it is an embarrassment on the international level.
Can you imagine negotiating a treaty or trade deal with this guy?

The art of diplomacy is important and if you cannot do  that dance I have to 
imagine that no progress can be  made.  

From: Stefan Englhardt 
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 11:27 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies

>From a foreign view Trump looks like a comedian with a bad ghost writer.

We’ve strange politicians here too but looking at Trump I cant believe how

this „appearance“ is tolarated by a big american party. 

I am astonished how deep american candidates have to give up their private 
sphere and how

e.g. Clinton has to make open her emails. And then I see this candidate who is 
in now way

a nice person and nobody wants him as his neighbor.

 

I guess this is due the modern media companies. They get more attention

doing horseplay than showing boring political work.

 

 

 

Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. Dezember 2015 17:57
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies

 

Trump is a “populist” aka demagogue.  He reminds me of Latin American 
demagogues like Peron and Chavez.  You may say they were socialists and Trump 
is a conservative, but demagogues say whatever people want to hear.  Trump is 
hardly alone.

 

 

From: Jaime Solorza 

Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 10:18 AM

To: Animal Farm 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies

 

Mentiroso..... Spanish for  Trump.. ahem I mean liar... pendejo is better  word 
for Trump.....

On Dec 12, 2015 3:38 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:


  I listened to this story from On the Media on NPR, and found it very 
entertaining. It's a discussion about "Lies", and humans inability to just tell 
the truth.

    http://www.onthemedia.org/story/on-the-media-2015-12-04/

  One interesting sub-topic was Donald Trump, and an examination of 72 
statements from the Donald. Of the 72 statement examined by Politifact.org, 
exactly zero of the statements was considered "true". About 4% of his 
statements were considered "partially true", but 84% of his statements were 
"mostly false", "false", or "pants on fire".






--  bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 

Reply via email to