Whats wrong with the sand? I love that our limited IP4 space has pushed us to adopt 20th century technologies and topologies here
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > Yeah that’s true… for ISP’s that provide routers to customers then they > need to support it too … but I don’t see that as a major stumbling block > (although a lot of consumer routers are complete crap) … > > > > This started with ISP’s blaming content providers for not having enough > IPv6 reachable sites .. the major content providers all stepped up and > became IPv6 reachable… now it’s back to the ISP’s in my opinion… > > > > Here in Canada, my $$$job is one of the few ISP’s doing IPv6 on scale and > it’s a sad situation > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof > *Sent:* Monday, January 4, 2016 9:37 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same > Matt > > > > I think this goes hand-in-hand with ISP provided routers. I would not > want to deal with IPv6 and bring-your-own-router. > > > > > > *From:* Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> > > *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2016 8:13 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same > Matt > > > > Not really a great article in my opinion but at least Matt pushed on the > fact that IPv6 adoption is important. There are way too many ISP’s still > with their head in the sand with this … > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Sunday, January 3, 2016 9:29 PM > *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt > > > > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/3016666/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
