nest(s)cam is probably not hippapotamus compliant
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > If the facility has WiFi, wouldn’t people just get a Nestcam for $200 and > the cloud storage subscription for $10/mo? Or at least that would set the > expectations for what you could charge? > > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:56 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Selling and installing video surveillance systems. > > > http://www.pantagraph.com/news/local/new-law-allows-video-cameras-in-nursing-home-rooms/article_bc42a6da-8e84-5401-bb04-db32b6a370e8.html > > "The bill sponsored by Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago, and Sen. Terry Link, > D-Waukegan, requires consent from residents and their roommates for the > electronic devices that must be purchased, installed and maintained by > residents. > > The state will assist residents who cannot afford the cost of a device." > > > > Getting in on this state money might be worth looking into. A UPS with a > couple cameras and DVR in tamper proof case with those Kensington locks. > Nice cheap, reproducable kits, self installable (maintenance can install > tamper proof connectors for the kensington hook), on a lease. Big red > recording light on the top with a label saying "If RED light is off call > xxx-xxx-xxxx" Patient family has a secondary key to adjust the cameras, > Leasor has the combination to the master case, openable upon request (and > of course for a nominal site fee). Optional external touchscreen LCD > viewing panel with read only privilege as an upgrade option (for a nominal > fee). alot of nominal fee options for something like this. > > If you're a managed services provider, this is a good way to get in the > door on a maintenance contract for the overall IT of the facility, though I > wonder if the wording in the law would prohibit that as at that point you > may be considered a representative of the nursing home. > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> For the nursing home to do it, as opposed to allowing the family to do >> it, now I think you would be contending with HIPAA. They would probably >> require it to operate via FAX. >> >> >> *From:* Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:26 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Selling and installing video surveillance systems. >> >> >> Would be kewl, enter the patient name and room number, to view or >> something on-line, like a holel get on-line use your last name and room >> number thing.. >> >> >> >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. >> >> den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 <314-735-0270%20x103> – >> www.linktechs.net >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jay Weekley >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 6, 2016 6:43 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Selling and installing video surveillance systems. >> >> >> >> Cameras in the patients room to check on the family member? >> >> On January 6, 2016 5:28:23 PM CST, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> we may have a lucrative opportunity here in illinois, nursing home >> residents can now install cameras, as i understand it they have to be >> instelled by the resident or the poa. A leasing option is a moneymaker >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I don't install wireless cameras using WiFi....used to install 900 and >> 5GHz long ago...most of the stuff today I wire up >> >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> Wireless Systems Architect >> >> 915-861-1390 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> and FYI, if youre installing these 2.4 wireless security cameras, youre >> not installing security cameras >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:02 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Here you can do it, you just cant turn on any form of devi ce that >> connects to emergency services, everything but connect it, just cant >> connect it. >> >> >> >> The biggest problem is people see they can get 8-16 camera dvr systems >> often wireless for 2-400 bucks online and want to know why youre wanting >> 1-2k >> >> >> >> They always get what they pay for, but thats where the money is at, they >> get the cheap one and have their nephew install it, and you make your 1-2k >> on service charges when they end up calling you anyway to help them figure >> stuff out. Remember while youre making repairs to the garbage to quietly >> build out your own infrastructure for the system they ultimately buy from >> you to come back in and install correctly for an additional 1-2k >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> to be a security company.yes.........you are setting up private systems >> and they monitor themselves. you are just an installer and off site back >> up....i only install and set up....i don't offer back up services. >> >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> Wireless Systems Architect >> >> 915-861-1390 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, but in NY you need a license for this. I'm not sure how common that >> is in other states, but I thought it worth mentioning. >> >> >> >> On 1/6/2016 5:44 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: >> >> yes....small car lots, repair centers, clinics, daycares, ....go after >> the small ones...bars, laundramats.... >> >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> Wireless Systems Architect >> >> 915-861-1390 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jay Weekley <par...@cyberbroadband.net> >> wrote: >> >> Is there any money to be made by selling and installing video >> surveillance systems or do the big security system companies like ADT >> pretty much have the market wrapped up? Is there any recurring revenue to >> be made such as in off site storage of videos? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
