I've never heard of anyone using 3.5ghz in the US, but I think it is a pretty common band in other parts of the world... and there certainly is gear out there (Cambium even makes PMP450 for that band).
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > I thought there was licensed spectrum around 3.5 GHz but can’t find > anything in the FCC band plan, maybe I am remembering wrong, or maybe that > is somewhere else in the world? I thought that was part of the appeal of > 3650 was there was already WiMAX equipment built for licensed 3.5 GHz as > well as antennas. > > Doing a Google search, I find this article indicating there are > longstanding 3.5 GHz spectrum licenses in Canada: > > > http://www.itworldcanada.com/article/rural-users-lose-when-spectrum-is-hoarded-experts/47863 > > > *From:* Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016 1:41 PM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs > > Please forgive me for hijacking the thread!! But, the additional > bandwidth is not available at 3.65 or 3.5Ghz yet is it??? Nothing beyond > the 3.65 - 3.70Ghz as has been for quite sometime?? > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 50 mhz block its 3.65 mhz, there is no 50 mhz block in 2.5 ghz... They >> also state Caribbean... so that would mean either USVI or PR if they are >> sticking with FCC/ US markets.... >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >>> You can sign up for “insider news and priority access”: >>> http://infinitibroadband.com/ >>> >>> >>> *From:* Keefe John <keefe...@ethoplex.com> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 6:59 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs >>> >>> anyone know what 10 markets they're going to? >>> >>> On 2/2/2016 6:51 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>> >>> I suspect that it's supposed to be 2.5ghz... as far as I know, Huawei >>> doesn't make gear for the 3.65ghz band. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> That can’t possibly be what they mean by acquiring 50 MHz of licensed >>>> spectrum in all their markets from a private party, can it? >>>> >>>> Did they also acquire an elevator pass from a high school senior? >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 6:43 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs >>>> >>>> >>>> It’s all in the marketing and presentation to the investors. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 2, 2016 5:16 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> i think they are touting that they have a nation wide NN license for >>>> the 3.65-3.7Ghz band (like the rest of us lol). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> says 3.5GHz>>.is that correct? >>>> >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>> >>>> 915-861-1390 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.telecompetitor.com/infiniti-broadband-to-bring-broadband-wireless-to-10-markets/ >>>> ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* >>>> >>>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040* >>>> >>>> *602-426-0542 <602-426-0542>* >>>> >>>> *r...@triadwireless.net <r...@triadwireless.net>* >>>> >>>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net>* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> “When you're in a slump, it's almost as if you look out at the field >>>> and it's one big glove.” - Vance Law >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Philip J. Rankin > Wireless Telecommunications Services > PO Box 24 > Pittsburg, KS 66762 >
