If I remember correctly, when I had an AT&T demo phone, it wasn't usable at quite a few of our towers... but it likely would be 100%, or at least close to for SMS on top of the towers.
We don't really have anything that can't be accessed year round. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > For SMS? 100% coverage. > > Out of reach? Not really. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Feb 11, 2016 2:58 AM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < > li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > >> A quick question for those on the list: >> >> Can I get a quick idea of roughly what percentage of everyone's tower >> locations are covered with enough AT&T service that you could do either >> basic data or send/receive text messages? >> >> If you'd like to be even more helpful, you could also let me know the >> answer to the same question, but only including those sites that are a >> challenge to reach for at least a portion of the year. (For instance, >> those that require a specialized vehicle to reach). >> >> I'm working on a project which requires a cellular carrier. Verizon >> isn't looking likely due to network restrictions. The other option is AT&T. >> >> -- >> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >> >>
