I missed the 802.11g part. That's even worse
On Feb 17, 2016 9:08 AM, "Colin Stanners" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Moxa (yet another wifi at 900mhz... with all the shortcomings and only
> G, not N) is not a good idea and xG is a nice system but likely very
> expensive and low speed, more for high-reliability/mobile communications.
>
> Neither are serious contenders for scalable / interference-resisitant /
> good value WISP use; the only good option for that has Cambium FSK up to
> now (I've heard good things about WaveIP but not seen much anywhere) and
> now the PMP450.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> the moxa video made me cringe.. if I wanted to use 802.11n in 900mhz I'd
>> use ubnt.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> XG technology and Moxa
>>> On Feb 17, 2016 5:08 AM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What besides pmp450i?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Woodfield, President
>>>>
>>>> Delmarva WiFi Inc.
>>>>
>>>> 410-870-WiFi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 11:25pm
>>>> To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Resurgence of 900
>>>>
>>>> In last few months I have heard of three new 900MHz products....I
>>>> started my wireless career with it and still love using it....should be an
>>>> interesting year.  Wonder what I will learn and see next week in Phoenix.
>>>> I enrolled in several LTE and DAS courses as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to