The tapeworm sounds like the way to go... somebody should start marketing that as the new miracle diet :P
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Simon Westlake <[email protected]> wrote: > It's tedious but you get good at it really fast. Once you get used to it, > each meal takes maybe a minute. > On Feb 21, 2016 12:37 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, how easy is it to actually input all your food? Seems like it would >> be a hassle. >> >> *From:* Simon Westlake <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 10:30 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: OT medifast >> >> If your goal is pure weightloss, the best and fastest way is to start >> properly counting calories. Buy a Fitbit, link it up to MyFitnessPal on >> your phone, and be fastidious about entering what you eat. When you really >> track your calories, you will see exactly what you need to cut back on in >> order to maintain weight loss (or you'll go walk another 2-3 miles to work >> off the Snickers you just ate.) >> >> I don't think anything works except calorie counting. It's way too easy >> to misjudge how much you're eating/drinking. My wife, my Dad and his >> girlfriend and a number of other people I know have been doing a Fitbit (or >> some similar step tracker) and MyFitnessPal and they've all lost a >> significant amount of weight doing it. All of them just set MPF to 1-2lbs >> of weightloss a week, it calculates how many calories you need to eat a day >> to get there and it just works. For a reasonable loss of 1-2lbs a week, >> you'll probably need to eat about 500 calories below your total daily >> energy expenditure, which is really not very hard, especially if you >> consume a lot of empty/junk calories today as those are the simplest things >> to cut back on. >> >> I think that the truly good thing about this method is that it just >> modifies your daily behavior, rather than you switching to a fad diet, >> losing the weight and then going back to old habits, and it's not very >> difficult or expensive. >> >> On 2/21/2016 10:29 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: >> >> And no, I don’t want to stop swallowing.... >> >> *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 9:27 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT medifast >> >> I finally threw out my bag of DDT wetable powder. Not popular with the >> Rachael Carson crowd... >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 9:25 AM >> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT medifast >> >> >> You need the DDT diet. >> On Feb 21, 2016 8:56 AM, "Chuck McCown" < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Still trying to shed holiday pounds. Seems harder each year. I know a >>> bunch of guys that have lost a bunch of weight with medifast. Seems >>> expensive. I did nutrisystems years ago and it worked pretty good. Any >>> opinions? (My wife is a fantastic cook, getting rid of her is NOT an >>> option). >>> >> >> -- >> Simon Westlake >> Skype: Simon_Sonar >> Email: [email protected] >> Phone: (702) 447-1247 >> --------------------------- >> Sonar Software Inc >> The next generation of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >> >>
