I have several situations with UBNT as you describe working very well. As with anything with wireless YMMV.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:45 AM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > We get decent near-LOS out of our 3.6 450. NLOS, like 900 NLOS... not a > chance in hell. I suppose my house would be an exception, although I'd > still call it near-LOS. I have a very old large maple tree about 100 feet > away (in the neighbor's yard) directly in the path. Beyond that it is > clear. My SM is on a reflector at 40 feet. And the sector is at 225 feet. > One mile away. I get about -57dBm Rx power level. Works a hell of a lot > better than the UBNT ever did, that's for sure. > > On 2/24/2016 8:32 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > > I am primarily using the KPP 120 degree sector and i am not happy with > performance. I am using the Cambium 90 degree sector in one application and > its NLOS and works very well. Just wondering if anyone else is having > similar results to that. > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:58 AM, timothy steele <timothy.pct...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> If your going for Nlos I would try and stay away from 120. Even Ubnt will >> tell you they don't like 120 >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:02 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, looking at the pattern in the spec sheet for the Cambium antenna, >>> it looks to be about -10db at 120. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:46 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> All I have used is the Laird OEM antenna as well. The null-fill is >>>> nice. It is definitely a -6dB 90/-3dB 65. I have found that it rolls off >>>> sharply beyond 90. >>>> >>>> Cambium claims >32dB F/B ratio. I know Mark @ Amplex has mentioned this >>>> before, short range SMs (like 1/2 mile or so) seem to get crappy downlink >>>> SNR. They are apparently hearing the opposite sector on the same frequency >>>> which points to the F/B ratio. I have seen this as well. I actually put up >>>> a post on the Cambium community about it last night. >>>> >>>> On 2/23/2016 12:24 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >>>> >>>> Sean, >>>> >>>> Really? I was told the 90 degree cambium sector was actually a 65 >>>> degree sector so you using it at 120 degrees? I would assume there is at >>>> least a 6db difference between the center of the beamwidth and the outer >>>> edges at 120 degrees. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Sean Heskett < <af...@zirkel.us> >>>> af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've only used the cambium one...works great. >>>>> >>>>> You can actually use it as a 120* sector if you need to, you just >>>>> loose 3db more than at the 90* point. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Kurt Fankhauser < >>>>> <lists.wavel...@gmail.com>lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone used all three of these antenna choices for PMP450/3.65ghz >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>>> - KP 120 degree 3.65ghz slant sector >>>>>> - Cambium Stock 90 degree 3.65ghz slant sector >>>>>> - Alpha Wireless 120 degree 3.65ghz slant sector >>>>>> >>>>>> And what was your thoughts on all of them? Did any perform worse or >>>>>> better than the other? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > >
