I wish Telco System's web site was better.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gino Villarini" <ginovi...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com, af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:11:10 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik VPLS Problem? telco systems 3348 would be a good fit 4 10g ports + 8 1g ports Sent from Outlook Mobile On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:07 PM -0800, "Sterling Jacobson" < sterl...@avative.net > wrote: Both are 10G 1072 CCR routers. The customer is on an SFP 1Gbps laser in a 10Gbps port. One essentially running as a switch with bridges for the VPLS endpoints. The other running BGP, VRRP, VPLS and bridges. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 7:36 AM To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik VPLS Problem? is this a 1G router? or 10G? On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Adam Moffett < dmmoff...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> /tool traffic-monitor can run a script when bandwidth goes above or below a given threshold. On 2/28/2016 9:50 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: <blockquote> I can’t figure this out, must be a flaw in routeros or mikrotik routerboard. Is there a way to create a script that says something like this: If bandwidth (TX) on interface drops below 50Mbps then start a Btest to another router for 10 seconds and stop, then wait 10 minutes and start watching again. From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik VPLS Problem? Had to shrink it a bit. From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Joe Novak Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 7:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik VPLS Problem? If you attempted to attach a picture it didn't make it to the list I don't think. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Sterling Jacobson < sterl...@avative.net > wrote: <blockquote> I can't for the life of me figure this out. I have two CCR routers running OSPF/MPLS/VPLS between them. There is traffic flowing between them from two different VPLS tunnels. Occasionally, as shown in the graph, just one of them (same one every time) will throttle to 35Mbps download. Sometimes it recovers on its own after a few minutes, or over an hour. IF I go into the CCR INSIDE that tunnel (IP addresses inside the tunnel on both sides) and start a TCP bandwidth test between them, I get 900+Mbps and it magically fixes the problem every time. The only difference between the two tunnels I can tell, is the problem one is routing a block to an end router outside the tunnel on that port with a connected IP, and the other is a direct block routing to gateway on the edge CCR. Explain that one to me! </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
