Based on this nifty fact sheet it seems like the parties have soiled the nest but not seeking prior approval. https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/guides/private-wireless-licensees-obligations-under-section-310d-communications-act-1934
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:40 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > ISP B would have to give up the licenses if they are not using them I > would think. > You cannot license some links and then not build them out. No camping > allowed, and that is the position they would have with licenses but no > radios. > > *From:* cjwstudios <cjwstud...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:18 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License > Requirements- Hypothetical > > That's great info. Hope to find a case on it. > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com> wrote: > >> Part 1.948 makes it a requirement and there have been very large fines >> levied for transferring licenses without first gaining FCC approval >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *cjwstudios >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:09 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License >> Requirements- Hypothetical >> >> >> >> Thanks Tim, it feels like 101.55 is optional, don't you think? Would be >> neat to say that the trigger of a merger or similar action requires the >> transfer of a license. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com> wrote: >> >> Not a lawyer – but 101.55 is the rule section >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *John Woodfield >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:04 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License >> Requirements- Hypothetical >> >> >> >> I had this situation, in our case the links were unneeded and antiquated >> so we opted to replace them. >> >> >> >> That probably doesn't help you but it was easiest for us. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> John Woodfield, President >> >> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> >> 410-870-WiFi >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "cjwstudios" <cjwstud...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:00pm >> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Subject: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License >> Requirements- Hypothetical >> >> I have a hypothetical I would appreciate some opinions on, knowing no one >> is a lawyer; >> >> If ISP A acquires ISP B's fixed microwave point to point stations which >> have operating licenses in an asset acquisition, and ISP B refuses to >> transfer said licenses to ISP A, which CFR or ruling governs ISP A's >> solution? Since ISP A is now the operator of the control point they would >> be illegally operating the point to point stations without assuming them >> from ISP B, am I correct? >> >> Any rulings, court cases, opinions would be super. Thanks in advance. >> >> >> > >
