It's hard for me to compete with the ubnt and netonix products, mainly
because of volume differences.   There are also some key design and
customer RMA philosophy differences which increase costs - I really don't
feel like it's right to cut corners which significantly decrease
reliability, and then refuse to warranty products because the design was
damaged by static, or a short, or similar - all of which should be
survivable.   High-current lightning strikes?  Maybe not...

Like you pointed out though I think I'm in the right price range,
especially If I can do a better job of describing the differences here.   I
also am working hard on getting that price down.

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote:

> 18 ports sounds reasonable to me, it will fit the needs to most any site.
> I could see myself buying 2 units and stacking them such that 50% of my APs
> were connected to unit #1 and 50% connected to unit #2.
>
>
>
> On pricing, if you don’t require sync, this unit would somewhat compete
> with the UBNT EdgeSwitch, ES-16-150W, that unit is $300 for 16 24V and PoE+
> ports. But it does lack several features you provide.
>
>
>
> The alternative Netonix WS-12-400AC is $399.95
>
>
>
> So the $800 price is a great deal compared to the CTM-2 product, but about
> double the UBNT and Netonix competitor.
>
>
>
> I think the uplift from $400 to $800 would be worth it if it supported
> more voltage standards than the UBNT product, and provided redundant power
> options that both of those devices lacked.
>
>
>
>
> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-0000
> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian
> (List Account)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> *To:* af <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync
>
>
>
> Well, it looks like it might actually be finally happening.
>
>
>
> We are about 98% sure we have a rackmount enclosure manufacturer which we
> can work with. Domestic.  Product looks decent.  Price is right.
>
>
>
> Which means it's time to nail down a few details here, such as number of
> ports, so I can get some enclosures cut and boards made and hopefully get
> this elephant out of the room....
>
>
>
>  So I need some input:
>
>
>
> The rough figures I'm working with here is $800 for a 18 port rackmount
> power injector.  Voltage and pinning jumper selectable per port. Per-port
> control of power and sync.  Probably some redundant power and other things
> built in, but I'm still nailing those details down (a lot of it comes down
> to space on the front panel of the enclosure).
>
>
>
> PLEASE NOTE:  The prices here are soft - until I get the design completed
> I won't know what I can sell this for - as many of  you know I try to price
> things at a fair price as opposed to what the market will bear.
>
>
>
> The main questions I have for the list are:
>
>
>
> Is 18 the correct number of ports?   18 is looking like about the most I
> can fit based on front panel dimensions.  This corresponds to 3 blocks of 6
> ports (if you lose a port and need to replace it, you'd replace 6 at a
> time).
>
>
>
> Other options are 16 (4 blocks of 4), and pretty much any smaller
> quantities of ports which are divisible by 4 or 6.
>
>
>
> I guess what I'm really asking here is whether the 18 port version for
> $800 is the only version of this I should make or carry, or does it make
> sense to sell (as an example) an 8 port version for $400 instead of or in
> addition to this?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>


-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>

Reply via email to