For me, no. They are all 1gb.

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sovereen, David A
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:42 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP

Is this AP connected to a 100Mbps port while your others are connected to a 
1000Mbps port?

Dave

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 4:28 PM, Robert Haas <rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> We have the same issue, just at one site. Air test shows 75x20,  a speedtest 
> plugged into the radio shows 15x10. Plugged directly into the same port on 
> the router (RB2011uais-rm) maxes the backhaul link (Rocket M5 @ 20Mhz). Tried 
> different AP radio's, different firmwares, tried a switch between the AP & 
> Router, tried with the client radio in bridge & nat modes, tried with PPPoE 
> and with static IP's assigned.. Nothing has seemed to make a difference at 
> the site. We have 7 other deployments that we have not seen this issue with 
> that have very similar setups.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Gerlach
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 1:21 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
> 
> we have the same Problem with the epmp Stuff..only problems and bugs from the 
> beginning!
> 
> 2016-03-07 17:00 GMT+01:00 Darren Shea <darr...@ecpi.com>:
>> We had seen some issues with ePMP customers on high-speed plans getting poor 
>> speedtest results - we found that changing the customer's router's MTU from 
>> Auto to 1480 helped immensely. Another factor was to make sure that all 
>> backhauls in the path were running at full connection speed (in other words, 
>> a backhaul whose Ethernet port can run at 1000M should be running at 1000M, 
>> even if the traffic never approaches 100M) all the way out to the internet.
>> 
>>  --  Darren
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson
>> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 10:27 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
>> 
>> Sp I have an issue. Tower is a 4 sector ePMP setup and two backhauls.  We 
>> are seeing poor throughput when connected to the APs (all of them). Signals 
>> are great. Quality and capacity are great.  When going through the AP we are 
>> consistently seeing 4-5 megs of download out to a known speedtest server.  
>> If we plug into the same wired port on which the AP, which gave us the poor 
>> throughput, we can max out the 100 meg uplink. Issue only happens when going 
>> through the wireless.   Here is what I know:
>> 
>> 
>> 1.APs are set to 75/25.  SM can do a link test and get 50meg x 12meg on the 
>> link test.  So RF is good.  Isolated AP to where only one client was on.  
>> Same great results.
>> 
>> 2.Firmware does not seem to be a factor.  Can reproduce this on 2.6.1, 
>> 2.5.1, and 2.4.3.
>> 
>> 3.Have replaced POE injectors 3 times with different manufactures.
>> 
>> 4.Does not matter if it is DHCP or PPPoE. Hard wired is fine.  Wireless 
>> stinks.
>> 
>> 
>> The AP is plugged into a POE which then plugs into a Mikrotik 2011.  If I 
>> plug into the same exact port the aps plug into speeds are great. The only 
>> thing that is left is patch cable to POE, Cable to AP, or AP.  I refuse to 
>> think 6 cables on the tower do the exact same thing.  The odds for that are 
>> Powerball winning crazy. Speediest from a laptop hooked to an SM to the 2011 
>> are poor.  4-5 megs consistent with spikes up to 10-13, but all over the 
>> place.  Acts like negotiation.  Have set Mikrotik to Auto, to 100 meg full, 
>> only accepted 100 meg on auto.
>> 
>> Customers who have 5 meg packages or below don’t see this.  Those with 10 
>> meg packages are the ones seeing 4-5 meg speeds. 10 meg packages did work.
>> 
>> Clients are mainly at 2.6.1, but we can reproduce this with a 2.5 and 2.4.x 
>> SMs. Nothign has changed in the network, which tests out just fine up to the 
>> point it gets handed off to the ePMP.
>> 
>> Anyone ran into this? Any thoughts?
>> 
>> Justin
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to