SNMP really need to go as a whole, but until we can cross that river, it's what we have to work with for most manufacturers.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:19:49 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cacti Users poll You're not thinking this through. TCP/IP is a totally different animal. SNMP is old too, we're just using much easier and yet better tools to manage systems at scale and including prebuilt extensions to give us things SNMP can't on many systems. It's more like the difference between a reel mower and a zero-turn riding mower ;) Both tools have similar functions, one is simply making your life a lot easier and faster if you've got a bit job to do. On Mar 22, 2016 8:14 AM, "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: I'd say it's a pretty good one. Just because something is old it absolutely doesn't make it antiquated or useless. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 22, 2016 9:09 AM, "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > wrote: <blockquote> That's possibly the worst analogy I've ever heard a human being make. Congrats! :) On Mar 22, 2016 8:06 AM, "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: <blockquote> So is TCP/IP Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 22, 2016 9:04 AM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: <blockquote> Cacti is old, time to move on... ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "SmarterBroadband" < li...@smarterbroadband.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 1:10:16 PM Subject: [AFMUG] Cacti Users poll A number of us are cacti users. Who would be interested in forming a group, where we all pay a small monthly fee to have a “company” build and manage a cacti template library for us? We would specify our template requirements. They would be expected to; Create templates as requested. Update templates for new firmware. Keep a library of all templates. I don’t know what company yet. What do you think? Adam </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
