I hear a lot of people praising the old UBNT M gear for it’s consistant and stable behavior now.
We tested it as soon as it came to market and considered it junk. UBNT throws out hardware and then do the SW. At some time it is usable and stays usable. Their AC gear is now usable (not in mixed mode as I have heard). Starting with UBNT AC we had no RMA so far with 100 devices. With ePMP we had to test the first batch as there were some defective devices. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von John Woodfield Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. März 2016 13:23 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP rant Thats a first, someone who claims UBNT is more stable than ePMP. John Woodfield, President Delmarva WiFi Inc. 410-870-WiFi -----Original Message----- From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:23am To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP rant We pull the plug now on our ePMP installations. We still have disconnects. Every day a disappointed customer calls. We dont look at this anymore. We give them a Mikrotik or a UBNT AC to make them happy and take the ePMP SM back. We had several problems with SW quality in the past. We had bad SMs we need to RMA. At some time it seems stable. Now problems came back. Not sure it is SW or HW. We dont want to bother any longer. This gear is low quality no matter what is said by marketing. We go UBNT AC now. Blazing fast webinterface, background channel scan and more speed on 20MHz Channels. Everywhere we use it we have much better results than with ePMP. These ePMP fans want to tell 11ac is not needed as 256QAM is never achievable. we see it at most of our installed cpes. If signal is to weak for 256QAM there are cheap dish-cpes.
