Well, if  it breaks, it  is  hydrogen and will shoot upward.  

Tritium beta particles are extremely low energy.   They are totally blocked by 
the phosphorus in the gun site.  If they get out, they cannot penetrate skin.  

If you purposely tried to inhale it, it would be in your body for a few weeks.  

From: George Skorup 
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 10:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?

Tritium illuminates reticles on some of my scopes, too. I assume that's what 
you're talking about anyway. It's sealed inside of an aluminum tube, how bad 
could it be? Meh.


On 4/1/2016 10:20 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

  I can't count the amount of tritium in my house on two hands.

  And we always have lots of bananas! ;)

  I used to be stuck in a situation where I was forced to breath molten 
"depleted" uranium smoke though :/

  On Apr 1, 2016 10:13 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

    I do have chunk of uranium in a drawer in my kitchen.  People do not have a 
realistic sense of the relative risk.  

    From: Chuck McCown 
    Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:11 PM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?

    What exactly do  you imagine a radiation “leak” is.
    We are talking uranium dioxide.  A ceramic pellet.  Does not burn, melt, 
dissolve, evaporate...

    From: Stefan Englhardt 
    Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:53 PM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?

    Reprocessing does not solve the problem. This waste does not vanish for an 
insane amount of time. No covering material lasts long enough. You have to 
reencapsule it to keep radiation inside. You need a place to store it and watch 
nothing leaks. Our power companies try to split the responsibility to a 
separate company. They know this company will die sometimes in the future.

    -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
    Von: Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> 
    Datum: 02.04.2016 03:04 (GMT+01:00) 
    An: af@afmug.com 
    Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one? 


    And why are you thinking the waste needs to be encapsulated?   
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis

    Just reprocess it.  And really it is not that dangerous.   A tanker of 
chlorine or ammonia is much more dangerous.  


    From: Stefan Englhardt 
    Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 6:56 PM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?

    Nuclear is very expensive. If you calculate the cost of moving and 
reencapsulating the waste for some thousand years. Your ancestors will learn 
that no energy company will exist long enough to take responsibility for the 
waste they generated. This will be done by the tax payer.

    -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
    Von: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
    Datum: 01.04.2016 22:18 (GMT+01:00) 
    An: af@afmug.com 
    Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one? 



Reply via email to