It would be nice if they had at least made it like a 2 port RB260GS in an outdoor case, although as far as I can tell, those don't have DOM capabilities either.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I really wasn't trying to be condescending, it would actually be a useful > thing to have a media converter that understood optic DOM and could be > monitored... Even if it only had a maximum of three or four OIDs to poll, > for link status, Rx power, link speed on the copper port. > > But by the time one adds that functionality you have a $65 device vs. a > $35 media converter and it's basically the same cost as a cheap mikrotik > router with an SFP port. > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> Fuck, I don't know. First time I heard about it. Didn't know if it was >> MikroTik's attempt at a "media converter" that's basically a two-port >> switch. That's why I asked. God damn, I asked a question and got an answer, >> but thank you for the condescending commentary. >> >> On 4/5/2016 11:28 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: >> >> It's a media converter, over what IP data connection is it supposed to >> speak SNMP or report DOM data from the optic? >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >> >>> I was hoping it was managed so that we can monitor Rx power levels. Oh >>> well. >>> >>> >>> On 4/5/2016 10:54 PM, Stefan Englhardt wrote: >>> >>> Cheap and works. >>> >>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>> Von: George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> <geo...@cbcast.com> >>> Datum: 06.04.2016 03:52 (GMT+01:00) >>> An: af@afmug.com >>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] MikroTik FTC >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
