Yes Cisco gear is finicky with lots of wireless gear....except theirs...go
figure
On Apr 7, 2016 9:15 AM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote:

> We are taking a Cisco switch out there to see what happens.  Personally I
> think the port on the Cisco is bad.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 7:22 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Connecting to a a Cisco Firewall
>
>
>
> Never seen this with ASA. We use the smaller ASAs with 100M at customer
> sites without issues.
>
> Connected different Servers and Mikrotik Routers including GE-Interfaces.
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *Im
> Auftrag von *Rory Conaway
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 7. April 2016 16:15
> *An:* [email protected]
> *Betreff:* [AFMUG] Connecting to a a Cisco Firewall
>
>
>
> Anyone have problems with staying connected to a Cisco AS Firewall with
> 100Mbps?  We had troubles with the Mimosa B5-Lite, at first it was fine for
> a few days, then started dropping the connection on the Ethernet port, then
> it pretty much went offline completely.  We put a TS-5 in there as a quick
> test and it ran 24 hours, same thing this morning.  The B5-Lite and the
> TS-5 seem to be working perfectly and we don’t have a problem with the
> B5-Lite attached to the Netonix on the other side.  We have tried forcing
> all devices to 100Mbsp and it works for a while.  In this case, setting it
> back to Auto on the T@-5 brought it back online.  At this point, we are
> telling the client the port is bad on the Cisco since this is 2 devices
> with the same problem.   Is this common when attaching to Cisco 100Mbps
> devices with 1Gbps ports?
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <602-426-0542>*
>
> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>
> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>
>
>
> “I wish I could play little league now.  I’d be way better than before.”
>
>
>

Reply via email to