I’ll care about IPv6 when Fox News tells me to care about it. Until then, I’m
busy not caring about climate change. Both are liberal plots to distract us
from important issues like who uses what bathroom. Get your priorities
straight, people!
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 12:14 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations
The downside still exceeds the upside. Until that equation changes, there's not
enough incentive.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 5/2/2016 9:18 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Everyone *SHOULD* be caring about IPv6.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 10:18:41 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations
Yes that'd be double NAT. Who cares about IPv6...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On May 1, 2016 11:16 PM, "Nate Burke" < n...@blastcomm.com > wrote:
It seems like the "Official" Solution is to put a 2nd router behind it, then
put that router on a DMZ Address. Wouldn't that mean Double NAT Then? And
probably loose all the IPv6 then.
On 5/1/2016 10:14 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Can you just set it to bridge?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On May 1, 2016 11:13 PM, "Nate Burke" < n...@blastcomm.com > wrote:
I'm doing work at an office that is fed with AT&T DSL. The AT&T router is a
piece of Garbage. I can't disable the internal DHCP Server, or do any IPV4 port
forwarding (however, it is handing out IPv6 addresses) On the inside of the
network, I already have unifi and Managed switches, so I just need a hardwired
DSL router with no Wifi. Any recommendations for one? I'd love to use a
Mikrotik, but I don't think they ever came out with a Routerboard with a DSL
Port did they?
