Yeah, I looked at setting it up that way at one point, but something didn't look like it was going to work quite the way I wanted it to... but I probably spent all of five minutes on it, so it may very well be possible. The way ePMP does it is really nice though... and simple.
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > People do it for sure. I want to say there was an example on the forums > or some where... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On May 4, 2016 9:35 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have our ePMP's setup to get their public IP via PPPoE, and the radio >> also gets a completely separate private management IP via DHCP, which is >> the only way you can remotely access the radio, and it doesn't even have to >> be in a separate vlan unless you want it to be... and it's one checkbox to >> configure it. >> >> I'm not sure if that can be duplicated on UBNT or not, since I haven't >> really tried yet, but at the very least it's a lot more complicated to >> configure. >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com >> > wrote: >> >>> It does...you just need to set it up that way. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I really wish Ubiquiti radios had a separate management vlan option (in >>>> router mode), like ePMP does... >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would encourage you to put your CPEs on a management vlan, in >>>>> RFC1918 space. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, SmarterBroadband >>>>> <li...@smarterbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>> > Hi Tushar >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > We run all radios in NAT mode. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Adam >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tushar Patel >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 3:34 PM >>>>> > To: af@afmug.com >>>>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT CPE being used for Abusive actions? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Radios could be put on private ip so nobody from outside world can >>>>> access >>>>> > it. That is what we do. >>>>> > >>>>> > Tushar >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On May 4, 2016, at 5:22 PM, SmarterBroadband < >>>>> li...@smarterbroadband.com> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I have received a number of emails for ab...@light-gap.net saying >>>>> certain of >>>>> > our IP address are being used for attacks (see email text below). >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > All IP addresses are in UBNT radios. We are unable to remote access >>>>> any of >>>>> > the these radios now. We see that the radio we are unable to access >>>>> > rebooted a couple of days ago. A number of other radios show they >>>>> rebooted >>>>> > around the same time (in sequence) on the AP. We are unable to >>>>> remote >>>>> > access any of those either. Other radios with longer uptime on the >>>>> AP’s are >>>>> > fine. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > We have a tech on route to one of the customer sites. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > We think the radios are being made into bots. Anyone seen this or >>>>> anything >>>>> > like this? Do the hackers need a username and password to hack a >>>>> radio? >>>>> > I.E. Would a change of the password stop the changes being made to >>>>> the >>>>> > radios? Any other thoughts, suggestions or ideas? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Adam >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Email Text below: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > “This is a semi-automated e-mail from the LG-Mailproxy authentication >>>>> > system, all requests have been approved manually by the >>>>> > system-administrators or are obviously unwanted (eg. requests to our >>>>> > spamtraps). >>>>> > >>>>> > For further questions or if additional information is needed please >>>>> reply to >>>>> > this email. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > The IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx has been banned for 48 hours due to suspicious >>>>> > behaviour on our system. >>>>> > >>>>> > This happened already 1 times. >>>>> > >>>>> > It might be be part of a botnet, infected by a trojan/virus or >>>>> running >>>>> > brute-force attacks. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Our affected destination servers: smtp.light-gap.net, >>>>> imap.light-gap.net >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Currently 7 failed/unauthorized logins attempts via SMTP/IMAP with 6 >>>>> > different usernames and wrong password: >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-04T23:48:40+02:00 with username "downloads.openscience.or.at >>>>> " >>>>> > (spamtrap account) >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-04T22:47:19+02:00 with username "sp_woq" (spamtrap account) >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-04T14:55:11+02:00 with username "info" (spamtrap account) >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-03T21:24:22+02:00 with username "fips" (spamtrap account) >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-03T20:57:19+02:00 with username "downloads.openscience.or.at >>>>> " >>>>> > (spamtrap account) >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-03T10:13:59+02:00 with username "d10hw49WpH" (spamtrap >>>>> account) >>>>> > >>>>> > 2016-05-03T05:34:43+02:00 with username "12345678" (spamtrap account) >>>>> > Ongoing failed/unauthorized logins attempts will be logged and sent >>>>> to you >>>>> > every 24h until the IP will be permanently banned from our systems >>>>> after 72 >>>>> > hours. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > The Light-Gap.net Abuse Team.” >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
