thats what i did, didnt find anything just found out, you apprently should not add a toghswitch, the UI is hanging now...thats the ubnt ive come to know :-)
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Discovery only works on layer 2. You have to switch it to IP mode and just > type in subnets like so "10.10.5.0/24, 10.11.5.0/24, " and so on. > > > > -Ty > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I still need to read up on how to scan subnets, it fails to add anything. >> I have to manually add the device >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> I wish they hadn't abandoned it. It is one of the best things about >>> running a ubnt network. I have mine scan my subnets every night so I have >>> monitoring of all radios from the start. >>> On May 17, 2016 12:04 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> holy dog balls, that was a simple install and simple configuration. >>>> UBNT and beta together always scares me, but this is a slick tool. Chuck M >>>> must have overseen it since it actually works >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:17 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> is the windows server variant heavy? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:16 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> nm, i see it now >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:15 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> can you point me to where i would get it >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Ty Featherling < >>>>>>> tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Current AC2 is beta 21. I just installed it myself after a failed >>>>>>>> upgrade from my old beta 12 install. It will do mass firmware updates, >>>>>>>> password changes, and a set number of other configuration changes. The >>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>> 2 things I wish it did that it doesn't are firewall updates and viewing >>>>>>>> bridge tables for devices. Great tool for everything else. I installed >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> local beta of the new CRM thing and It seems like it barely does >>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>> by comparison. If you go the the forums and find the AC2 beta forum, >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> first sticky post is the latest version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:07 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We need to do some mass password changes and verification of the >>>>>>>>> firmware, I assume this AC2 does this, can somebody point me to the >>>>>>>>> most >>>>>>>>> current iteration of this? We do have the beta access. Im just >>>>>>>>> fearful of >>>>>>>>> wandering too much on the forum looking. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Will AC2 let me add configurations en mass? I need to change and >>>>>>>>> add some settings, if there is a fairly simple way of doing this >>>>>>>>> (preferably with error checking) assuming that AC2 doesnt do it I >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> sure appreciate some pointers (that dont assume I am a script >>>>>>>>> magician) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Josh Reynolds < >>>>>>>>> j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You want a toe? I can get you a toe, believe me. There are ways, >>>>>>>>>> Dude. You don't wanna know about it, believe me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hell, I can get you a toe by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with >>>>>>>>>> nail polish. >>>>>>>>>> On May 17, 2016 9:43 AM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" < >>>>>>>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I WILL SEND YOU A BILL!!! (FOR YOUR HATE))) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> hah >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:29 AM >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ubnt malware >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're the hatiest! Our hate is refined though, and surgically >>>>>>>>>>> applied. The forums are more like monkeys throwing their hate-shit >>>>>>>>>>> indescriminately. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Bill Prince < >>>>>>>>>>> part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All your hate are belong to us. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/17/2016 6:25 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, we got hate here... I hate it when people complain about >>>>>>>>>>>> our lack of hate. We can hate with the best of them, just choose >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> reserve it for a better time and place... afmug: higher quality >>>>>>>>>>>> hate >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2016 7:21 AM >>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ubnt malware >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> When Steve comes back from somewhere complaining of too much >>>>>>>>>>>> hate, you know that place is a hell-hole. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> holy nuggets of hate. I just got done reading the 31 pages of >>>>>>>>>>>>> hate, now i remember why i dont ever go there >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:49 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wow, port 19081 turns out to be pretty popular >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one im cleaning up now has a child connection active in it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> since i logged in, im curious what its doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mhoward...@gmail.com>mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...unless of course it gets on a PC at the office... in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which case we'd be in trouble. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mhoward...@gmail.com>mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True! but that hasn't happened yet, and it still shouldn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get beyond that customer's radio. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Mike Hammett < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <af...@ics-il.net>af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until it gets delivered via Flash or Java or something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Mathew Howard" < <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *"af" < <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, May 16, 2016 9:16:40 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ubnt malware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have firewall rules at the edge of the network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocking the management ports ti the airrouters that are on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public IPs, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're probably fine. We still have some radios that are on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old firmware, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I haven't been able to find anything on our network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's infected. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately, when I was setting up the firewall rules to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block access to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CPEs from outside our network, I decided it was desirable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to block >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customers from being able to get to other customers radios as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well... which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should break the self replicating part of this thing, so even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow get into our network, it shouldn't be able to get far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I'm updating everything that isn't on at least >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.6.2 right away. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 16, 2016 8:41 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, thats amazing me, one fella was complaining about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how much of a problem it would be to take a unit offline to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get on a bench. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would think if things are that bad that your network is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutting down, convenience would be the least of your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have to investigate a couple anomalies on the network, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the back of my mind Im hoping the air routers have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hit to put a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nail in their coffins so we cam go with mikrotiks as the CPE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Josh Reynolds < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <j...@kyneticwifi.com>j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or threatening to sue because of their own personal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance and negligence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 16, 2016 8:32 PM, "Mike Hammett" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <af...@ics-il.net>af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A good amount of it is just people that don't know any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better making false observations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To: * <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, May 16, 2016 8:19:00 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] ubnt malware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From what im reading in their forums something set off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over the weekend? or is it ubnt douche nozzles? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds almost as if this malware is actively being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manipulated (changing from key access to foul >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> username/password, wandering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control ports, etc, like script kiddies found a new toy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is this thing self propagating from the device? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't see your team as part of yourself you have already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.