Silver has it beat for conductivity.   

Carbon (graphene form only)
Silver
Copper
Gold 
Aluminum
Calcium
Tungsten
Zinc
Nickel 
Lithium
Iron
etc 

From: Sean Heskett 
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 3:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] GPRO stock

Exactly my point Cameron ;-)

Before Nixon
1oz gold == $35US or inversely $1 == 1/35oz gold...seems pretty standard to me. 
  

Also your own quote states "The government held the $35 per ounce price until 
August 15, 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced that the United States 
would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed value, thus completely 
abandoning the gold standard."

After Nixon
Gold and the dollar float.  Gold is now traded as a commodity as it should.  
Otherwise the world economy is tied to a very finite amount (183,600 tonnes) of 
a shiny rock whose real value is it's chemical element properties. It is the 
best (naturally occurring) conductor of electricity and the best reflector of 
infrared heat (amongst many other properties).  

1/256,280oz gold (2 cents at todays prices ;)

-Sean


On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Cameron Crum <cc...@wispmon.com> wrote:

  Not sure what history books you are reading, but On June 5, 1933, the United 
States went off the gold standard, a monetary system in which currency is 
backed by gold, when Congress enacted a joint resolution nullifying the right 
of creditors to demand payment in gold. The United States had been on a gold 
standard since 1879, except for an embargo on gold exports during World War I, 
but bank failures during the Great Depression of the 1930s frightened the 
public into hoarding gold, making the policy untenable. 


  The government held the $35 per ounce price until August 15, 1971, when 
President Richard Nixon announced that the United States would no longer 
convert dollars to gold at a fixed value, thus completely abandoning the gold 
standard. In 1974, President Gerald Ford signed legislation that permitted 
Americans again to own gold bullion.


  On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:

    Actually Nixon got us off the gold standard.  And it's a good thing because 
with an $18trillion GDP for just the US alone there is no way our current 
economy would operate being tied to a shiny rock.  That phone in your pocket 
would cost $1million or more just from the gold inside of it :-/ 

    Leave the shiny rocks to the hippies at EDM festivals lol.


    -Sean


    On Tuesday, May 17, 2016, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

      You think that's bad?  The USD isn't backed by gold but rather a 
fictitious system controlled by private banks.  Thanks, FDR. 


      Josh Luthman
      Office: 937-552-2340
      Direct: 937-552-2343
      1100 Wayne St
      Suite 1337
      Troy, OH 45373

      On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

        That is soooo sad

        On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:31 PM Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

          Who care about P&L?  It's stocks. 

          AAPL is one of the biggest companies out there.  There is no real 
correlation between stocks and how the company operates.


          Josh Luthman
          Office: 937-552-2340
          Direct: 937-552-2343
          1100 Wayne St
          Suite 1337
          Troy, OH 45373

          On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lewis Bergman 
<lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:

            Yep. Which is why they both make me nervous. You can't ever guess 
where those types will go by looking at balance sheets and P&L. Although to 
tell the truth, it had been pretty difficult to do that with any stock for a 
long time. 



            On Tue, May 17, 2016, 1:57 PM Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

              ...you mean like AAPL?


              Josh Luthman
              Office: 937-552-2340
              Direct: 937-552-2343
              1100 Wayne St
              Suite 1337
              Troy, OH 45373

              On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Lewis Bergman 
<lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:

                Not that it matters, as I think GPRO is mostly a marketing play 
at this point, I saw some film of some competitors product with a really nifty 
360 camera for about half of a Hero3.
                On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:38 PM Chris Wright 
<ch...@velociter.net> wrote:

                  I sure hope it goes back to $15. I bought at $12 last on its 
uptick and then it plummeted. L



                  Chris Wright

                  Network Administrator

                  Velociter Wireless

                  209-838-1221 x115



                  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay 
Fuller
                  Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:22 AM
                  To: af@afmug.com


                  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] GPRO stock





                  oh, i know i don't matter...



                    ----- Original Message ----- 

                    From: Robert 

                    To: af@afmug.com 

                    Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 9:49 AM

                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] GPRO stock



                    Just after Icann sold a billion...  just to make sure you 
know you don't matter...



                    On 5/17/16 7:45 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:

                      I heard burkshire just bought a billion worth of apple 
yesterday....





                        ----- Original Message ----- 

                        From: Travis Johnson 

                        To: af@afmug.com 

                        Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 9:23 AM

                        Subject: [AFMUG] GPRO stock



                        Hey... if anyone is looking for a 4-5 month stock with 
the possibility 
                        of a 50% return, you should take a look at GPRO. It's a 
great buy right 
                        now and I personally think it will hit $14-$15 again 
within the next six 
                        months. :)

                        Travis





Reply via email to