Most content is available on IPv6. I think Amazon is the extent of the big guys that aren't IPv6.
It is a lot more efficient too, from a routes advertised perspective. You likely ever only need 1 IPv6 block. How many IPv4 blocks do you have? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:27:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ipv4 vs ipv6 FIB size To wit? Not sure if this gives credence to my frustration with the whole IPv6 ‘transition’ and lack of IPv4, or if it means IPv6 is somehow more optimal. I’m thinking the former. And I’m thinking it’s the CDN/content providers fault. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ipv4 vs ipv6 FIB size I've been running a script for the last few months which grabs the current size of the ipv4 and ipv6 FIBs for a full routing table, once a day, and writes it to an RRA. here's the results: http://imgur.com/a/iJfPT That chart with the green is actually drawing both v4 and v6 on the same chart. That almost impossible to see blue line at the bottom of the chart? That's the v6. For comparison, a standalone v6 chart is the second image.
