we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap only has like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it scaling well compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could ever dream. Its sync lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet. 3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage (though the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge of nlos
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will offer a bit > better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >> have not deployed more then couple test links. >> >> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >> >> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
